Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Hjorth vs Giovanni Calvano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hjorth vs Calvano analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Hjorth vs Giovanni Calvano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hjorth 1 - 0 Calvano
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hjorth has won 47.79% of points on their second serve, while Calvano has won 41.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hjorth, in recent form, has won 52.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Calvano has won 52.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.28% and 41.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hjorth has saved 55.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Calvano has saved 48.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hjorth has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 30/ 18), with Calvano winning 54.76% (W/L 23/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hjorth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Calvano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 97/ 84), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hjorth has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18), where as Calvano has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hjorth winning 1 times and Calvano being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hjorth winning 2 and Calvano winning 0. The last match between Hjorth and Calvano was at the M25 Varnamo, 10-05-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Philip Hjorth getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hjorth and Calvano have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hjorth winning 0 times and Calvano 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hjorth winning 0, and Calvano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hjorth has played against opponents with an average rank of 62.25 while Calvano has played against players with an average rank of 190.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hjorth has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Calvano has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hjorth has converted 51.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Calvano has converted 54.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
54% (39-33)
Career Total W/L
53% (100-90)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
59% (10-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Philip Hjorth | Giovanni Calvano |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) | 73% (32/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (17/28) | 50% (16/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (13/20) | 17% (2/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (26/44) | 38% (18/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Philip Hjorth
Player
Giovanni Calvano
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Hjorth | Giovanni Calvano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 59% (10/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (30/20) | 55% (21/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (254/211) | 50% (170/168) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 59% (10/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 29.25 | 223.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (550/889) | 67% (737/1099) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (358/550) | 56% (414/737) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (162/339) | 43% (154/362) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (44/86) | 53% (70/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (359/857) | 46% (479/1031) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (14/10) | 59% (10/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (14/23) | 63% (10/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 40% (10/4) |
Philip Hjorth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Verbeek
Player
Philip Hjorth
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nino Toto
Player
Philip Hjorth
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Philip Hjorth
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Giovanni Calvano
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Patrik Munkhammar
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Filip Stidell
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Philip Hjorth
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Philip Hjorth
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Francisco Rocha
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Giovanni Calvano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Giovanni Calvano
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
107)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
59 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
118
|
0-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Melih Anavatan
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Norbert Marosik
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
S Mert Ozdemir
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Giovanni Calvano
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Ruben Hartig
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Karl Friberg
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
53%
(
43 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Gola
Player
Giovanni Calvano
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
46
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Hjorth Vs Calvano Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hjorth are available here and Calvano photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Philip Hjorth
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
